伊人网国产视频,99精品国产一区二区,国产精品九九九九九九九,激情综合亚洲欧美调教,性刺激的欧美三级视频,中文字幕在线观看一区二区,97国产精品久久久久久

特朗普演講全文:為什么退出巴黎協(xié)議?

2017-6-12 11:10 來源: 精英博覽

特朗普演講全文:為什么退出巴黎協(xié)議?


川普在白宮玫瑰園作退出巴黎協(xié)議的演講(圖片來源:Getty Image) 

內(nèi)容很有看點,某些國家僅僅著重譴責川普決定退出氣候協(xié)議,卻對美國退出的原因,以及美國在氣候協(xié)議方面的角色、地位、成就、影響只字不提。發(fā)布這篇演講全文,僅希望客觀看待這一事件。天下沒有免費的午餐,沒有任何國家有義務去無條件承擔本應由他國該承擔的責任,不要因別人的放棄而回避、掩蓋自己該承擔的責任。

以下為演講全文——
 
謝謝,在這個演講之前,我們首先關(guān)注一下馬尼拉的恐怖襲擊。我們一直在密切注意事態(tài)的發(fā)展,并會持續(xù)關(guān)注事情的任何變化。在世界范圍內(nèi)的蔓延的恐怖襲擊實在是太糟糕了。我們關(guān)心并為所有涉及到的人祈禱。

在我們討論巴黎協(xié)議之前,有必要先說說自從選舉日(11月8日)以來我們在經(jīng)濟方面所取得的非常巨大的成就:經(jīng)濟迅速地回升,在股票市場的市值增加了3.3萬億。增加了100多萬的就業(yè)崗位。

我這次從海外回來,期間簽訂了價值3500億美元的軍工和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的合同,這又能增加上千個就業(yè)崗位。這是一次相當成功的訪問,相信我。

在G7國會議上,我們邁出了歷史性的一步,強烈要求公平和互惠的貿(mào)易,使美國獲得和其他國家公平競爭的機會。我們在中東和平事務中也作出了非常大的努力,甚至包括尋求以色列和巴勒斯坦之間的和平。跟前一屆政府相比,我們對恐怖主義的打擊大大加強。這些你們都看到了。包括讓許多其他國家為打擊恐怖主義作出貢獻,很多以前不太出力的國家現(xiàn)在正為反恐做出巨大貢獻。

一件接一件,我們正在履行競選期間對美國人民所作的承諾:砍掉繁文縟節(jié),增加工作機會;任命和確認最高法院大法官;實行全新的,更加嚴格的道德規(guī)范;創(chuàng)紀錄地減少非法移民入境;將大量工作機會和制造業(yè)帶回美國,以前沒人相信能夠做到。相信我,我們只是剛剛開始。我們努力的成果很快就會展現(xiàn)出來。

還有很多很多,我們正在履行我們的承諾。我不會允許任何事阻擋我們前進的步伐。每一天,我都在為這個國家的偉大人民而戰(zhàn)。因此,為了履行我保護美國及其公民的神圣職責,美國將退出“巴黎氣候協(xié)議”(掌聲)謝謝,謝謝,而且重新開始談判,要么重返“巴黎氣候協(xié)議”,要么簽署一份全新的協(xié)議,但是這個協(xié)議必須對美國、美國的企業(yè)和工人、美國人民以及納稅人是公平的。是的,我們要退出巴黎氣候協(xié)議,但是我們將重啟談判,看看能否達成一個公平的協(xié)議。如果可以的話,那最好。如果不行,也無所謂。(掌聲)

作為總統(tǒng),我的首要任務是保護美國公民的利益?!鞍屠铓夂騾f(xié)議”僅僅是又一個最新的例子證明華盛頓官僚曾經(jīng)簽署了對美國不利,而對他國有利的協(xié)議,讓我熱愛的美國工人和納稅人由丟失的工作,減少的收入,關(guān)閉的工廠,和大幅下降的經(jīng)濟生產(chǎn)活動替他國買單。

因此,從今天開始,美國將停止執(zhí)行本來就沒有約束力的“巴黎協(xié)議”,也不再承擔這個協(xié)議給美國帶來的沉重的財政和經(jīng)濟負擔。這包括停止繼續(xù)付款,特別是不再給綠色氣候基金注資,僅這一項就耗資巨大。

如果繼續(xù)遵守“巴黎協(xié)議”以及它在能源方面對美國強加的苛刻限制,根據(jù)國家經(jīng)濟研究協(xié)會的統(tǒng)計,到2025年美國會丟失270萬個工作。其中包括44萬個制造業(yè)崗位,這不是我們所需要的,相信我,這不是我們所需要的。美國人民賴以生存的重要行業(yè)將持續(xù)衰退。他們是如此地的依賴這些行業(yè),而我們能給予的卻如此之少。

這個調(diào)查報告還顯示,到2040年,遵守上屆政府的承諾將造成以下行業(yè)大幅減產(chǎn):造紙下降12%,水泥下降23%,鋼鐵下降38%,煤炭(我恰巧熱愛礦工)下降86%,天然氣下降31%。到這時,國民生產(chǎn)總值將下調(diào)3萬億美元,同時要丟失650萬個工業(yè)崗位,而家庭收入將減少7000美元,甚至更多。

這個協(xié)議不但嚴重制約我們的經(jīng)濟,也根本沒有體現(xiàn)我們的環(huán)保理念。就象很多人一樣,我也非常關(guān)心環(huán)境保護。但是我的良心讓我無法支持一個懲罰美國的協(xié)議,而美國在環(huán)保方面一直是世界的領(lǐng)導者。而對于真正的污染大國,這個協(xié)議卻沒有任何具有實質(zhì)意義的限制。

比如,在這個協(xié)議下,中國難以置信地可以在今后13年繼續(xù)增加排放量。也就是說13年內(nèi)可以為所欲為。但是我們不可以。印度參加的前提是必須可以從發(fā)達國家收到多少億美元的外援。還有很多其他例子,但是總結(jié)起來就是,巴黎協(xié)議對美國極其不公平。

目前的協(xié)議有效地阻礙了“清潔煤”在美國的發(fā)展。但我們準備開始開采煤礦。要開始開采大量的煤礦。這樣的開采,以前是很多年沒有聽說過了,很多年也沒有發(fā)生過了。他們問我是否想這么做,我回答是的。

根據(jù)這個協(xié)議,允許中國建造幾百個火力發(fā)電廠。我們不能,他們可以。根據(jù)這個協(xié)議,印度到2020年可以把煤炭產(chǎn)量增加一倍。想一想吧,印度可以加倍產(chǎn)煤,但是美國必須放棄煤炭。甚至歐洲都可以繼續(xù)建造火力發(fā)電廠。

簡而言之,這個巴黎協(xié)議并沒有減少礦工工作崗位的數(shù)量,只是把美國的煤炭工作轉(zhuǎn)移到了其他國家。

與其說這個協(xié)議是保護氣候,還不如說是讓世界各國占美國的便宜。當我們簽署“巴黎氣候協(xié)議”時,全世界都在贊賞,他們沒有瘋,他們欣喜若狂,非常開心。原因很簡單,它使我們的國家,我們熱愛的美利堅合眾國,處于嚴重的經(jīng)濟劣勢。諷刺點說,我們的經(jīng)濟競爭對手當然希望我們留在巴黎氣候協(xié)議里,這樣我們只好繼續(xù)承受這種自找的重大經(jīng)濟傷害。我們將很難與世界上其他國家競爭。

我們承擔了地球上最大的能源儲備負擔。而這些卻能使美國成千上萬的人民擺脫貧困。是的,在這個協(xié)議下,我們有效地將能源儲備給鎖了起來,將我國巨大的財富扔到了一邊。這是一個巨大的財富,一個顯著的財富。而這以前,我們都沒有意識到我們有這樣巨大的財富。而卻讓無數(shù)個美國家庭陷入貧困和無法就業(yè)。

巴黎協(xié)議就是劫富濟貧,把美國這樣巨大的財富分給其他國家。如果(經(jīng)濟)想實現(xiàn)1%的增長,可再生能源可以滿足我們國內(nèi)的需求。但是如果是我所希望的3%或者4%的增長,我們就會面臨著停電或者限電的危險?;蛘咴S多領(lǐng)域的企業(yè)就會出現(xiàn)停產(chǎn)。而許多的美國家庭也面臨著失業(yè)的風險,或者生活質(zhì)量的降低。

即使巴黎氣候協(xié)議全面執(zhí)行,而且每一個國家都百分之百履行自己的職責,到2100年全球氣溫也只是下降0.2度。這個數(shù)非常非常小。而事實上,中國14天的排碳量,就會把這一切抹去(這是個簡直無法讓你置信的數(shù)據(jù)),就相當于美國從現(xiàn)在到2030年減排的總量。然后讓我們花幾十億的美元,丟掉工作,關(guān)閉工廠,并迫使我們的企業(yè)和家庭花費更多的錢購買能源。

正如華爾街日報今天早上寫道:“現(xiàn)實情況是,撤出巴黎氣候協(xié)議符合美國的經(jīng)濟利益,而對氣候的影響不大?!贝ㄆ疹I(lǐng)導下的美國,依然是地球上最潔凈,最環(huán)保的國家。我們會是最干凈的。我們要有最干凈的空氣,我們要有最干凈的水。我們將致力于環(huán)保,但我們不會迫使企業(yè)關(guān)張,我們不愿意丟掉工作。我們要增長,我們要快速增長。(掌聲)

也就是幾分鐘前,我想你可能已經(jīng)讀了這份小小的商業(yè)報告:一些小企業(yè)正在蓬勃發(fā)展,招聘工人。這是許多年來我們所看到的最好的報告。我很愿意立即與民主黨領(lǐng)袖探討返回巴黎的談判內(nèi)容,前提是對美國和美國工人是公平的,或者談判出一個新的方案來保護我們的國家和他的納稅人。

所以如果阻撓者想和我們一起,讓我們使他們成為合作者。我們坐下好好談談。讓這個結(jié)果更好,我們不用關(guān)閉工廠,我們不用失去工作。我們會坐下來和民主黨以及所有代表巴黎協(xié)議的人好好談談。我們一定能談出一個比現(xiàn)在的巴黎氣候協(xié)議更好的方案??纯次覀兡茏鍪裁?。到那時,我認為我們國家的人民會非常激動,世界的人民也會非常激動。但在重新談判之前,我們要先退出現(xiàn)在的巴黎氣候協(xié)議。

我將致力于保證美國依然會保留現(xiàn)在的環(huán)境協(xié)議的領(lǐng)導者的地位,但必須是在公平的原則下,而且責任與義務必須由世界上的很多國家來共同擔當。

沒有一個領(lǐng)導者可以讓他們國家的工人與人民處于這種劣勢當中。事實上,巴黎氣候協(xié)議損害美國,卻讓世界上一些排污最大的國家強大起來。應該讓外界清楚知道外國游說者希望讓我們這個偉大的國家被這個協(xié)定束縛和捆綁的真正原因:使他們的國家獲取相對于美國在經(jīng)濟方面的競爭優(yōu)勢。對不起,當我做總統(tǒng)時,這些不會再發(fā)生了。(鼓掌)

我作為總統(tǒng)的工作就是,在我的權(quán)利范圍內(nèi),給美國一個公平競爭的環(huán)境,去發(fā)展經(jīng)濟,改革法規(guī)和稅收結(jié)構(gòu),使得美國成為這個地球上最繁榮和富有的國家,具有最高標準的生活質(zhì)量和最高標準的安全保護。

我們的稅收議案正在國會討論中,進展順利。我認為很多人會得到意外的驚喜的。共和黨正在非常非常努力地工作。我們也希望得到民主黨的支持,盡管最后我們不得不單獨行動。

巴黎氣候協(xié)議使美國經(jīng)濟處于劣勢,目的是為了獲得那些外國資本和全球活動家的贊賞,而這些人對我國的財富垂涎已久。他們可沒有將美國放在首位。而我是,我將永遠將美國放在第一位。

正是那些要求我們留在巴黎協(xié)議里的國家,他們通過強硬的貿(mào)易政策,從美國掠取了數(shù)萬億美元的財富。很多時候,又大把撒錢給了對我們有致命威脅的軍事聯(lián)盟。你們看到了都發(fā)生了什么。對于那些持開放思想的人來說,這一切是顯而易見的。

從什么時候起美國開始被貶低?在什么時候起他們開始嘲笑我們這個國家?我們要求對我國公民和納稅人受到公平的對待。我們不會再讓其他的領(lǐng)導人和其他國家嘲笑我們。他們也不能再嘲笑我們了,也不會再嘲笑我們了。

我被選出來是代表匹茲堡的公民的,不是巴黎。(掌聲)我保證我會按照美國的利益退出或者重新談判。許多的貿(mào)易條款都需要重新談判。以前我們?yōu)檫@個國家定的貿(mào)易條款太少了,但不久以后這些都要重新談判。這個工作馬上就會開始。這次我們得好好談談。

巴黎協(xié)議除了能源方面極其苛刻的限制之外,還包括另一個竊取美國財富的計劃,就是所謂的綠色氣候基金。多好聽的名字!這個基金要求發(fā)達國家向發(fā)展中國家提供1000億美元,這還是在美國現(xiàn)有的巨額外援之外另付的。所以我們要付出幾十、幾百億美元,我們的付出已經(jīng)遠遠超過了其他國家。而許多國家還沒花一分錢,有些國家永遠也不會支付一分錢。

綠色基金要求美國承諾數(shù)百億美元,美國已經(jīng)給了他們10億美元,遠遠大于別的國家;絕大多數(shù)國家還一分錢沒出。美國的這筆錢本來可以用來反恐。這是反恐的資金。相信我,這錢他們不是從我這拿到的。他們剛好在我上任之前拿到了這筆錢。這很不好。他們用這種方式拿錢很不好。

2015年,聯(lián)合國首席氣候官員的報告,將每年1000億美元的攤派描繪成“花生”(注:指很微小的東西),在他們的描述中這1000億美元就像搖動的狗尾巴一樣。2015年,綠色氣候基金的執(zhí)行董事報告說,在2020年以后,這個費用估計需要增加到每年4500億美元??墒?,沒人知道這些錢都去哪了。沒有人能回答:它們?nèi)ツ牧耍?/div>

當然,這個世界的最大的污染者在這個綠色基金的框架下是沒有確定的義務的。而美國卻欠下了20萬億的債務。那些經(jīng)濟陷入困境的城市沒有錢來雇傭足夠的警察,或者修復重要基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施。成千上萬的公民失去工作。而在這個巴黎氣候協(xié)議下,美國卻要拿出原本應該投入在美國的數(shù)百億美元投入到其他國家,而這些國家卻把工廠和工作從我們這拿走。想想這些吧。

這個協(xié)議,有嚴重的法律和憲法問題。歐洲的領(lǐng)導人,亞洲的領(lǐng)導人,以及世界各國的領(lǐng)導人,對美國的經(jīng)濟,不會比我們自己的公民有更多的發(fā)言權(quán)。因此,我們退出巴黎氣候協(xié)議,代表的是美國的主權(quán)。(鼓掌)我們的憲法在世界各國中是獨一無二的,而保護它是我至高的榮譽和義務。我會的。

留在這個協(xié)議中,使得美國這個能源儲備豐富的國家對能源的開采受到嚴重的限制。一個國際上的協(xié)議,來限制美國國內(nèi)的經(jīng)濟事務,這真是不可思議??墒?,如果我們不退出這個協(xié)議,或者我們不進行更好的談判,那我們就將面對這樣的現(xiàn)實。

隨著歷史的發(fā)展,這些協(xié)議只會隨著時間的推移變得(對美國)更加苛刻。換言之,巴黎框架是個起點,不是終點,這一點是最糟糕的。退出這個協(xié)議可以保護美國免受主權(quán)被侵犯與未來所要承受的巨大的法律責任。相信我,如果我們繼續(xù)留在這個協(xié)議中,我們會有巨大的法律責任。

作為總統(tǒng),我有一個義務,那就是對美國人民的義務。巴黎氣候協(xié)議損害我們的經(jīng)濟,損害我們的工人,削弱我們的主權(quán),使我們面對不可接受的法律風險,并使我們永久地處于相對世界其他國家的劣勢當中。

現(xiàn)在,是退出巴黎氣候協(xié)議的時候了,(掌聲)是時候來尋求一項新的協(xié)議來保護我們的環(huán)境、我們的公司、我們的公民和我們國家了。

是時候把楊斯頓、俄亥俄、底特律、密歇根、匹茲堡、賓夕法尼亞,還有我們偉大國家許多許多其他的城市排在法國巴黎的前面了。

是時候讓美國再次偉大了。(掌聲)

謝謝。

謝謝,非常感謝。

英文版

Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord

Rose Garden

3:32 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  I would like to begin by addressing the terrorist attack in Manila.  We’re closely monitoring the situation, and I will continue to give updates if anything happens during this period of time.  But it is really very sad as to what’s going on throughout the world with terror.  Our thoughts and our prayers are with all of those affected.

Before we discuss the Paris Accord, I’d like to begin with an update on our tremendous -- absolutely tremendous -- economic progress since Election Day on November 8th.  The economy is starting to come back, and very, very rapidly.  We’ve added $3.3 trillion in stock market value to our economy, and more than a million private sector jobs.

I have just returned from a trip overseas where we concluded nearly $350 billion of military and economic development for the United States, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs.  It was a very, very successful trip, believe me.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  

In my meetings at the G7, we have taken historic steps to demand fair and reciprocal trade that gives Americans a level playing field against other nations.  We’re also working very hard for peace in the Middle East, and perhaps even peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.  Our attacks on terrorism are greatly stepped up -- and you see that, you see it all over -- from the previous administration, including getting many other countries to make major contributions to the fight against terror.  Big, big contributions are being made by countries that weren’t doing so much in the form of contribution.

One by one, we are keeping the promises I made to the American people during my campaign for President –- whether it’s cutting job-killing regulations; appointing and confirming a tremendous Supreme Court justice; putting in place tough new ethics rules; achieving a record reduction in illegal immigration on our southern border; or bringing jobs, plants, and factories back into the United States at numbers which no one until this point thought even possible.  And believe me, we’ve just begun.  The fruits of our labor will be seen very shortly even more so.

On these issues and so many more, we’re following through on our commitments.  And I don’t want anything to get in our way.  I am fighting every day for the great people of this country.  Therefore, in order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord -- (applause) -- thank you, thank you -- but begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris Accord or a really entirely new transaction on terms that are fair to the United States, its businesses, its workers, its people, its taxpayers.  So we’re getting out.  But we will start to negotiate, and we will see if we can make a deal that’s fair.  And if we can, that’s great.  And if we can’t, that’s fine.  (Applause.) 
 
As President, I can put no other consideration before the wellbeing of American citizens.  The Paris Climate Accord is simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers -- who I love -- and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.

Thus, as of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the non-binding Paris Accord and the draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our country.  This includes ending the implementation of the nationally determined contribution and, very importantly, the Green Climate Fund which is costing the United States a vast fortune.

Compliance with the terms of the Paris Accord and the onerous energy restrictions it has placed on the United States could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025 according to the National Economic Research Associates.  This includes 440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs -- not what we need -- believe me, this is not what we need -- including automobile jobs, and the further decimation of vital American industries on which countless communities rely.  They rely for so much, and we would be giving them so little. 

According to this same study, by 2040, compliance with the commitments put into place by the previous administration would cut production for the following sectors:  paper down 12 percent; cement down 23 percent; iron and steel down 38 percent; coal -- and I happen to love the coal miners -- down 86 percent; natural gas down 31 percent.  The cost to the economy at this time would be close to $3 trillion in lost GDP and 6.5 million industrial jobs, while households would have $7,000 less income and, in many cases, much worse than that.

Not only does this deal subject our citizens to harsh economic restrictions, it fails to live up to our environmental ideals.  As someone who cares deeply about the environment, which I do, I cannot in good conscience support a deal that punishes the United States -- which is what it does -– the world’s leader in environmental protection, while imposing no meaningful obligations on the world’s leading polluters.

For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years -- 13.  They can do whatever they want for 13 years.  Not us.  India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries.  There are many other examples.  But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States.

Further, while the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America -- which it does, and the mines are starting to open up.  We’re having a big opening in two weeks.  Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places.  A big opening of a brand-new mine.  It’s unheard of.  For many, many years, that hasn’t happened.  They asked me if I’d go.  I’m going to try.

China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants.  So we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement.  India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020.  Think of it:  India can double their coal production.  We’re supposed to get rid of ours.  Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal plants.  

In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to foreign countries.

This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States.  The rest of the world applauded when we signed the Paris Agreement -- they went wild; they were so happy -- for the simple reason that it put our country, the United States of America, which we all love, at a very, very big economic disadvantage.  A cynic would say the obvious reason for economic competitors and their wish to see us remain in the agreement is so that we continue to suffer this self-inflicted major economic wound.  We would find it very hard to compete with other countries from other parts of the world.   

We have among the most abundant energy reserves on the planet, sufficient to lift millions of America’s poorest workers out of poverty.  Yet, under this agreement, we are effectively putting these reserves under lock and key, taking away the great wealth of our nation -- it's great wealth, it's phenomenal wealth; not so long ago, we had no idea we had such wealth -- and leaving millions and millions of families trapped in poverty and joblessness.

The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries.  At 1 percent growth, renewable sources of energy can meet some of our domestic demand, but at 3 or 4 percent growth, which I expect, we need all forms of available American energy, or our country -- (applause) -- will be at grave risk of brownouts and blackouts, our businesses will come to a halt in many cases, and the American family will suffer the consequences in the form of lost jobs and a very diminished quality of life.

Even if the Paris Agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a two-tenths of one degree -- think of that; this much -- Celsius reduction in global temperature by the year 2100.  Tiny, tiny amount.  In fact, 14 days of carbon emissions from China alone would wipe out the gains from America -- and this is an incredible statistic -- would totally wipe out the gains from America's expected reductions in the year 2030, after we have had to spend billions and billions of dollars, lost jobs, closed factories, and suffered much higher energy costs for our businesses and for our homes.

As the Wall Street Journal wrote this morning:  “The reality is that withdrawing is in America’s economic interest and won’t matter much to the climate.”  The United States, under the Trump administration, will continue to be the cleanest and most environmentally friendly country on Earth.  We'll be the cleanest.  We're going to have the cleanest air.  We're going to have the cleanest water.  We will be environmentally friendly, but we're not going to put our businesses out of work and we're not going to lose our jobs.  We're going to grow; we're going to grow rapidly.  (Applause.)  

And I think you just read -- it just came out minutes ago, the small business report -- small businesses as of just now are booming, hiring people.  One of the best reports they've seen in many years.

I’m willing to immediately work with Democratic leaders to either negotiate our way back into Paris, under the terms that are fair to the United States and its workers, or to negotiate a new deal that protects our country and its taxpayers.  (Applause.) 

So if the obstructionists want to get together with me, let’s make them non-obstructionists.  We will all sit down, and we will get back into the deal.  And we’ll make it good, and we won’t be closing up our factories, and we won’t be losing our jobs.  And we’ll sit down with the Democrats and all of the people that represent either the Paris Accord or something that we can do that's much better than the Paris Accord.  And I think the people of our country will be thrilled, and I think then the people of the world will be thrilled.  But until we do that, we're out of the agreement.  

I will work to ensure that America remains the world’s leader on environmental issues, but under a framework that is fair and where the burdens and responsibilities are equally shared among the many nations all around the world.  

No responsible leader can put the workers -- and the people -- of their country at this debilitating and tremendous disadvantage.  The fact that the Paris deal hamstrings the United States, while empowering some of the world’s top polluting countries, should dispel any doubt as to the real reason why foreign lobbyists wish to keep our magnificent country tied up and bound down by this agreement:  It’s to give their country an economic edge over the United States.  That's not going to happen while I’m President.  I’m sorry.  (Applause.) 

My job as President is to do everything within my power to give America a level playing field and to create the economic, regulatory and tax structures that make America the most prosperous and productive country on Earth, and with the highest standard of living and the highest standard of environmental protection. 

Our tax bill is moving along in Congress, and I believe it’s doing very well.  I think a lot of people will be very pleasantly surprised.  The Republicans are working very, very hard.  We’d love to have support from the Democrats, but we may have to go it alone.  But it’s going very well.  

The Paris Agreement handicaps the United States economy in order to win praise from the very foreign capitals and global activists that have long sought to gain wealth at our country’s expense.  They don’t put America first.  I do, and I always will.  (Applause.) 

The same nations asking us to stay in the agreement are the countries that have collectively cost America trillions of dollars through tough trade practices and, in many cases, lax contributions to our critical military alliance.  You see what’s happening.  It’s pretty obvious to those that want to keep an open mind.  

At what point does America get demeaned?  At what point do they start laughing at us as a country?   We want fair treatment for its citizens, and we want fair treatment for our taxpayers.  We don’t want other leaders and other countries laughing at us anymore.  And they won’t be.  They won’t be.

I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.  (Applause.)  I promised I would exit or renegotiate any deal which fails to serve America’s interests.  Many trade deals will soon be under renegotiation.  Very rarely do we have a deal that works for this country, but they’ll soon be under renegotiation.  The process has begun from day one.  But now we’re down to business.

Beyond the severe energy restrictions inflicted by the Paris Accord, it includes yet another scheme to redistribute wealth out of the United States through the so-called Green Climate Fund -- nice name -- which calls for developed countries to send $100 billion to developing countries all on top of America’s existing and massive foreign aid payments.  So we’re going to be paying billions and billions and billions of dollars, and we’re already way ahead of anybody else.  Many of the other countries haven’t spent anything, and many of them will never pay one dime.  

The Green Fund would likely obligate the United States to commit potentially tens of billions of dollars of which the United States has already handed over $1 billion -- nobody else is even close; most of them haven’t even paid anything -- including funds raided out of America’s budget for the war against terrorism.  That’s where they came.  Believe me, they didn’t come from me.  They came just before I came into office.  Not good.  And not good the way they took the money.  

In 2015, the United Nation's departing top climate officials reportedly described the $100 billion per year as “peanuts,” and stated that "the $100 billion is the tail that wags the dog."  In 2015, the Green Climate Fund’s executive director reportedly stated that estimated funding needed would increase to $450 billion per year after 2020.  And nobody even knows where the money is going to.  Nobody has been able to say, where is it going to? 

Of course, the world’s top polluters have no affirmative obligations under the Green Fund, which we terminated.  America is $20 trillion in debt.  Cash-strapped cities cannot hire enough police officers or fix vital infrastructure.  Millions of our citizens are out of work.  And yet, under the Paris Accord, billions of dollars that ought to be invested right here in America will be sent to the very countries that have taken our factories and our jobs away from us.  So think of that.  

There are serious legal and constitutional issues as well.  Foreign leaders in Europe, Asia, and across the world should not have more to say with respect to the U.S. economy than our own citizens and their elected representatives.  Thus, our withdrawal from the agreement represents a reassertion of America’s sovereignty.  (Applause.)  Our Constitution is unique among all the nations of the world, and it is my highest obligation and greatest honor to protect it.  And I will.

Staying in the agreement could also pose serious obstacles for the United States as we begin the process of unlocking the restrictions on America’s abundant energy reserves, which we have started very strongly.  It would once have been unthinkable that an international agreement could prevent the United States from conducting its own domestic economic affairs, but this is the new reality we face if we do not leave the agreement or if we do not negotiate a far better deal.

The risks grow as historically these agreements only tend to become more and more ambitious over time.  In other words, the Paris framework is a starting point -- as bad as it is -- not an end point.  And exiting the agreement protects the United States from future intrusions on the United States' sovereignty and massive future legal liability.  Believe me, we have massive legal liability if we stay in.

As President, I have one obligation, and that obligation is to the American people.  The Paris Accord would undermine our economy, hamstring our workers, weaken our sovereignty, impose unacceptable legal risks, and put us at a permanent disadvantage to the other countries of the world.  It is time to exit the Paris Accord -- (applause) -- and time to pursue a new deal that protects the environment, our companies, our citizens, and our country.  

It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania -- along with many, many other locations within our great country -- before Paris, France.  It is time to make America great again.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you very much. 

Thank you very much.  Very important.  I’d like to ask Scott Pruitt, who most of you know and respect, as I do, just to say a few words.  

Scott, please.  (Applause.) 

ADMINISTRATOR PRUITT:  Thank you, Mr. President.  Your decision today to exit the Paris Accord reflects your unflinching commitment to put America first.

And by exiting, you're fulfilling yet one more campaign promise to the American people.  Please know that I am thankful for your fortitude, your courage, and your steadfastness as you serve and lead our country.

America finally has a leader who answers only to the people -- not to the special interests who have had their way for way too long.  In everything you do, Mr. President, you're fighting for the forgotten men and women across this country.  You're a champion for the hardworking citizens all across this land who just want a government that listens to them and represents their interest.

You have promised to put America First in all that you do, and you've done that in any number of ways -- from trade, to national security, to protecting our border, to rightsizing Washington, D.C.  And today you've put America first with regard to international agreements and the environment. 

This is an historic restoration of American economic independence -- one that will benefit the working class, the working poor, and working people of all stripes.  With this action, you have declared that the people are rulers of this country once again.  And it should be noted that we as a nation do it better than anyone in the world in striking the balance between growing our economy, growing jobs while also being a good steward of our environment.  

We owe no apologies to other nations for our environmental stewardship.  After all, before the Paris Accord was ever signed, America had reduced its CO2 footprint to levels from the early 1990s.  In fact, between the years 2000 and 2014, the United States reduced its carbon emissions by 18-plus percent.  And this was accomplished not through government mandate, but accomplished through innovation and technology of the American private sector.

For that reason, Mr. President, you have corrected a view that was paramount in Paris that somehow the United States should penalize its own economy, be apologetic, lead with our chin, while the rest of world does little.  Other nations talk a good game; we lead with action -- not words.  (Applause.) 

Our efforts, Mr. President, as you know, should be on exporting our technology, our innovation to nations who seek to reduce their CO2 footprint to learn from us.  That should be our focus versus agreeing to unachievable targets that harm our economy and the American people.

Mr. President, it takes courage, it takes commitment to say no to the plaudits of men while doing what’s right by the American people.  You have that courage, and the American people can take comfort because you have their backs.  

Thank you, Mr. President. 

END
4:03 P.M. EDT

最新評論

碳市場行情進入碳行情頻道
返回頂部